The last week, we have discussed the masculine and self-centric
side of foreign policy. This week we are going to look at the alternative ways
of how Sweden conducts her feminist foreign policy as a challenge and
alternative to the traditional definition of foreign policy.
Back in 2014, Sweden has proclaimed to be the first state
who uses feminism as its foreign policy ideology. The message is clear, in the
male-dominated world, someone has to stand up to defend the feminine identity
and the so-called marginalized voice through institutional ways. Margot
Wallstrom was the one who announced it to the public when he was Swedish
Minister for Foreign Affairs. A bold move considering the debates over feminism
as a concept still widely occurs.
Basically, she interprets feminist foreign policy as a
combination of three pillars: Representation, Resource, and Rights (3R). More
representation of women in the decision making process. They are allocating
more resources to address the minority group problem. And to construct a policy
formulation that focuses on women's rights—in short, eliminating a structural
barrier to women equality.
The debates spark along the way. Is it possible to not being
self-centric in this anarchic world? How feminist is feminist foreign policy? How
different is it from "traditional" foreign policy?
Here I discussed it with Radityo Dharmaputra, Foreign Policy
Analysis lecturer at Airlangga University, who currently a PhD student at the University
of Tartu, Estonia.
Here is the full record. Happy Listening!
2 comments
Keren, Mas!
ReplyDeleteThank you!
Delete